Wednesday, 19 April 2017 08:55

A long road to clean up waterways

Written by  Pam Tipa
Sir Peter Gluckman. Sir Peter Gluckman.

While the public might hope for rapid restoration of water quality in all rivers and lakes in New Zealand, this is unrealistic and scientifically impossible.

So says Sir Peter Gluckman, the Prime Minister’s chief science advisor.

“In some cases we are dealing with contamination that occurred decades ago, and the legacy effects may take a similar time to flush from the system,” he says in his report ‘New Zealand’s fresh waters: values, states, trends and human impacts’.

“Moreover there are no silver bullets in water restoration: multiple actions are needed, requiring partnerships between central and local authorities, iwi, citizens and businesses including farmers.

He says there are clearly very complicated trade-offs between public expectations, economic drivers and recreational considerations in protecting our fresh water.

Federated Farmers says Gluckman’s water quality report confirms there are no easy, quick fixes to NZ’s water quality challenges, and regarding sources of water degradation all sectors are culpable.

The report rightly identifies the challenge as needing to balance the effects of economic development and recreational pursuits on water quality, and the desire of all NZers to look after our waterways, the Feds say.

Eighty percent of NZ’s waterways have stable or improving water quality, says Feds’ environment spokesperson and national board member Chris Allen.

“Where there are problems, all sectors of society including farmers are culpable and all sectors of society need to be part of the solutions.”

Feds say Gluckman’s report says our fresh water is under pressure from agriculture, hydro power, urban development (pollution from urban stormwater and industrial sources), the presence of introduced species (including didymo and giardia, carp and trout) and climate change.

The findings reinforce Feds’ long-held view that while farmers are part of the problem, we are by no means the whole problem, Allen says.

However Gluckman says in the report the main drivers of change in water quality “are linked primarily to agriculture and recent intensification, mainly dairying”.

“First, and perhaps most obvious, are the detrimental changes to water quality. Livestock farming’s impacts on water quality are both direct and indirect,” he says.

 

More like this

Farmers cheer water report

Dairy farmers are applauding the clear message in Sir Peter Gluckman’s freshwater report that everyone has a role to play in ensuring freshwater quality.

Mobile filter makes drinking water safe

Treating water collected from roofs, streams, springs, bores often falls into property owners’ too-hard basket, the excuse sometimes being that drinking the stuff builds immunities to local nasties.

 
 

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Asleep at the wheel?

The Hound hears that the jokes were on PM Bill English who was in fine form at the recent Ahuwhenua…

Go South

What is it with Massey University academics and their hatred of agriculture?

 

» Connect with Rural News

 
 

Markets

South Island wool sale eases

South Island wool sale eases

The 4700 bales on offer saw a 74% clearance with mixed results, however all prices paid locally are still above…

Wool continues to ease

Wool continues to ease

The 7250 bales of North Island wool on offer saw a 72% clearance with most types easing further.