fbpx
Print this page
Monday, 18 July 2022 14:55

"I'm not their mother" no excuse for lax health and safety

Written by  Staff Reporters
An agricultural fencing sole trader has been sentenced after failing to ensure one of his employees wore correct protective gear. An agricultural fencing sole trader has been sentenced after failing to ensure one of his employees wore correct protective gear.

A Kaikoura employer who didn’t provide appropriate eye protection has been sentenced for failings that cost a young worker his vision in one eye.

Daniel Anderson, an agricultural fencing sole trader, had a 17-year-old worker who was chiselling when a piece of metal flew into his right eye in March 2020. Despite multiple surgeries, the teenager lost sight in the eye.

Anderson did not notify WorkSafe of the injury, as required by the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015. Several months later the victim’s mother did so, triggering an investigation.

When a WorkSafe inspector asked Anderson whether he told workers to use protective gear, his response was “I’m not their mother and going to dress them every morning”.

Anderson confirmed he had not provided full instruction to the victim on the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), such as safety glasses, because in his words “it was common sense”.

Anderson also indicated to WorkSafe he felt it was too expensive to buy PPE, saying “I’m too small for that sort of… carry on”.

Anderson was sentenced at Kaikoura District Court on 15 July.

Judge Raoul Neave ordered $22,500 be paid for emotional harm and consequential loss, given Anderson’s lack of insurance and inability to pay a fine.

WorkSafe’s national manager of investigations, Hayden Mander says the employer’s comments reflect an outdated, unacceptable, and cavalier attitude.

“A young man at the start of his working life now has seriously impaired vision. It’s astounding for an employer to not understand the seriousness of the situation,” says Mander.

“The cost of health and safety is part of the cost of doing business. The worker should have been provided with appropriate PPE, including eye protection, and required to wear it when using a chisel and hammer or any other task where there is a risk of an eye injury.”

Workers who are vulnerable because of age, inexperience, or conditions of employment may be less likely to question health and safety practices of to speak up if they are unsure.

“Beyond the obvious health and safety gaps in this case, it’s both illegal and morally wrong for an employer of any size to not notify WorkSafe of an incident like this. No employer is exempt,” says Mander.

More like this

Featured

Women 'dominate vet profession'

Females are dominating the veterinary profession worldwide and many farmers are welcoming this change in the composition of the profession, says Britain's Chief Veterinary Officer (CVO) Professor Christine Middlemiss.

Fonterra appoints new CFO

Fonterra has appointed a new chief financial officer, seven months after its last CFO’s shock resignation.

National

Rural GP's inspiring legacy

The legacy of Dr Peter Snow continues to inspire as the recipients of the 2023 and 2024 Peter Snow Memorial…

Off the radar

A year on and the problems created by Cyclones Hale and Gabrielle has largely dropped off the radar of media…

Machinery & Products

GPS in control

In a move that will make harvesting operations easier, particularly in odd-shaped paddocks, Kuhn has announced that GPS section control…