Labour criticizes government for stifling agricultural growth
Labour's agriculture spokesperson says the Government’s decisions are set to hamstring growth within the farming sector.
OPINION: What does it say about our government when it sneaks its Gene Technology Bill through on the final day of Parliament and then expects our entire dairy sector to digest it all in the middle of the summer holidays?
Let’s be blunt: it screams unfairness, and it reeks of secrecy and it’s a slap in the face to every farmer who makes this nation prosper.
Together with sheep and beef, our sector makes up a massive 40% of our country’s exports. Yet, the Government, led by the allegedly probusiness National Party, seems determined to dismiss even the biggest voice in New Zealand agriculture, Fonterra. How exactly is that probusiness?
And why is a topic crucial to our industry and the NZ economy being funnelled through the Health Committee?
We aren’t here to argue for or against GM. Our point is that to present a Bill that could rewire our entire industry on eight-weeks’ notice is abjectly insulting and completely disregards the spirit of fair governance that all Kiwis value.
We might expect our biggest industry leader, Fonterra, to roar. Yet, from all reports, when Fonterra asked the Government for more time on this Bill, the request was denied; leadership simply shrugged and moved on. That’s unacceptable.
Our cooperative wields immense influence over our nation’s economy and, we should remember, is owned by thousands of shareholders who will bear the brunt of any shifts in policy.
Fonterra must publicly demand a 90-day extension for public comment on the Bill. If Chris Luxon refuses to accommodate, Fonterra trucks should stop rolling. It would probably take less than three hours for Luxon to yield.
This situation is so backward that it almost invites a conspiracy theory. Genetic modification might offer benefits in terms of efficiency or resilience, or it might threaten our single most important market advantage. Regardless, the fair questions at this point are, “What’s your hurry?” and “What are you hiding?” If the Gene Technology Bill is truly beneficial, then it will still be beneficial 90 days from February 17th.
This Bill, one way or another, will impact your family, your community, and your economic wellbeing. Ninety days isn’t a big ask. If Fonterra fails us, let the co-op leaders reap the whirlwind.
Fonterra needs to say, “This is not how you treat your largest export sector, nor your party’s base.” Let’s shine a light on the Gene Technology Bill and let’s decide on our own terms what’s best for our industry and New Zealand. These are the issues we need to consider:
Fonterra, the spotlight’s on you.
Michael Henne and John Greenberg are executives of NZ agribusiness company, Hyprecision Ag Ltd.
Managing director of Woolover Ltd, David Brown, has put a lot of effort into verifying what seems intuitive, that keeping newborn stock's core temperature stable pays dividends by helping them realise their full genetic potential.
Within the next 10 years, New Zealand agriculture will need to manage its largest-ever intergenerational transfer of wealth, conservatively valued at $150 billion in farming assets.
Boutique Waikato cheese producer Meyer Cheese is investing in a new $3.5 million facility, designed to boost capacity and enhance the company's sustainability credentials.
OPINION: The Government's decision to rule out changes to Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) that would cost every farmer thousands of dollars annually, is sensible.
Compensation assistance for farmers impacted by Mycoplama bovis is being wound up.
Selecting the reverse gear quicker than a lovestruck boyfriend who has met the in-laws for the first time, the Coalition Government has confirmed that the proposal to amend Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) charged against farm utes has been canned.