Print this page
Friday, 17 September 2021 14:48

Flood fund criteria way off the mark

Written by  Staff Reporters
Eligibility criteria for funding from the Canterbury Flood Recovery Fund are a barrier to some farmers receiving funding, says MP for Selwyn Nicola Grigg. Photo Credit: ECan Media Team Eligibility criteria for funding from the Canterbury Flood Recovery Fund are a barrier to some farmers receiving funding, says MP for Selwyn Nicola Grigg. Photo Credit: ECan Media Team

Nearly four months on from the floods that devastated much of rural Canterbury, the Government has fallen short of the promises it made to local farmers, says National MP Nicola Grigg.

“Jacinda Ardern and Damien O’Connor flew into Ashburton with cameras rolling to announce a $4 million Canterbury Flood Recovery Fund – indicating that it was just a start, that they were still working to establish the full scale and cost of the damage – and that there would be more where that came from,” says Grigg who is MP for Selwyn.

She says the fund offers grants of up to 50% of eligible costs with a total limit of $250,000 and will contribute to uninsurable costs to enable productive land to return to a productive state as quickly as possible.

“Essentially, it can only be used for the clearing up of flood debris such as boulders, gravel, trees, and silt on productive land. Insurable costs, such as replacing fences, have not been targeted by the fund.”

“Four months on and the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) has received 168 applications for support, with a total monetary value of $8,029,535.

“To put the number of applications into perspective there are over 550 properties in the ArcGIS survey database, suffering varying degrees of damage.

Grigg says that the criteria set for the fund requires 51% of income to be from the primary industries, meaning lifestyle blocks listed in the database were ineligible.

She claims that some listed in the database as sheep or beef farms have other income streams, including tourism and rental properties which exclude them from applying because they don’t meet the 51% threshold.

“In my view, that absolutely stinks. The Government set a criteria that was very difficult for highly-stressed, overworked and exhausted farmers to meet,” she says.

She says that while MPI has accepted 82 applications, they’re only paying $1,428,964 to those farmers and have declined a further 38 applications on the ground they don’t meet the eligibility criteria.

“And therein lies the problem – the eligibility criteria is far too strict and, therefore, discounts hundreds of affected farmers and landowners. The monetary value of the applications alone indicates the Government is way off target.”

Grigg says that O’Connor needs to instruct MPI to loosen its eligibility criteria and get the money to the farmers most in need.

More like this

High jump for the high country!

"An end to generations of thoughtful stewardship of the South Island's high country" is how the newly-enacted Crown Pastoral Land Reform Bill has been labelled.

Live export experts ignored

National's animal welfare spokesperson Nicola Grigg claims the Government completely ignored compelling evidence from cattle breeders, vets and export industry experts in its push to ban live animal shipments.


Controversial changes for pigs

A controversial new welfare draft code is triggering vigorous debate between pig farmers and animal welfare advocated as to what…

MPI to monitor winter grazing

As Otago and Southland enters the winter grazing season, MPI says it will have inspectors on the ground ensuring things…

Machinery & Products

Making life easier

Many temporary sheep fencing systems can be troublesome, with reels jamming or breaking and the bugbear of silly hooks on…

Valtra's following grows

With the release of its N5 and T5 series of tractors, Valtra continues to expand its presence in the Australia-New…