fbpx
Print this page
Tuesday, 10 August 2021 12:55

Wool legal wrangle

Written by  David Anderson
Godfrey Hirst is demanding Cavalier withdraw a number of claims promoting New Zealand wool as a more sustainable alternative to synthetic carpet. Godfrey Hirst is demanding Cavalier withdraw a number of claims promoting New Zealand wool as a more sustainable alternative to synthetic carpet.

Carpet maker Cavalier is facing the wrath of American-owned rival Godfrey Hirst over the Kiwi company's push to promote more woollen products.

Godfrey Hirst has demanded Cavalier withdraw a number of claims in its marketing campaign, which promotes New Zealand wool as a more sustainable alternative to synthetic carpet fibres, or face legal action under the Fair Trading Act.

It claims that Cavalier and Bremworth had "demonised" synthetic carpets, with what it alleges were false and misleading references to single-use plastic bags and microplastics, and by lauding environmental wool carpets without acknowledging the full environmental impacts of wool carpet manufacturing, including livestock farming and wool scouring chemicals required for insect-resistant treatment of wool.

However, Cavalier is refusing to cower to its American rival. In a statement, released to the NZX, it says it will not shy away from promoting the virtues of wool.

It's not the first legal challenge from Godfrey Hirst, a former Australian company bought by New York Stock Exchange-listed global flooring manufacturer, Mohawk, in 2017.

Late last yearm under former chief executive Paul Alston, Cavalier announced that it was getting out of synthetic carpets altogether.

This was seen as a bold move, but new chief executive Greg Smith says the consumer feedback had so far been positive.

"From my perspective, I am very confident in the natural fibre strategy and the way that we are trying to reach our consumers," he recently told the NZ Herald.

He says wool carpets were Bremwoth's history: "100 per cent wool is where we started."

Smith acknowledges that there is a consumer preference for synthetic carpet.

"Clearly consumers have embraced synthetics, as they have done in lots of different industries," he concedes.

He added that the decision to stop making synthetic carpets was a difficult one. "There are always revenue implications when you give up a slice of your business to go down a different path."

Smith points to the ban on plastic bags and the electric car subsidy as proof of the consumer landscape changing quickly.

"These things are all happening because consumers and want a more sustainable future," he says.

Smith believes that natural solutions are becoming more "normal".

More like this

Editorial: Making wool great again

OPINION: Otago farmer and NZ First MP Mark Patterson is humble about the role that he’s played in mandating government agencies to use wool wherever possible in new and refurbished buildings.

Wool pellets to boost gardens

With wool prices steadily declining and shearing costs on the rise, a Waikato couple began looking for a solution for wool from their 80ha farm.

Featured

Editorial: KiwiSaver to the rescue?

OPINION: Farmers are rightly urging the Government to relax the rules around KiwiSaver and allow young farmers to use their savings towards purchasing either a house, cows or a farm.

National

Machinery & Products

New Holland combines crack 50 years

New Holland is celebrating the 50th anniversary of the introduction its Twin Rotor threshing and separation technology, which has evolved…

Iconic TPW Woolpress turns 50!

The company behind the iconic TPW Woolpress, which fundamentally changed the way wool is baled in Australia and New Zealand,…