fbpx
Print this page
Thursday, 17 May 2018 07:55

Feds never was anti-NAIT

Written by  Don Nicholson
Don Nicholson. Don Nicholson.

Some assertions made in the Rural News editorial, ‘Get with the programme’ on April 3, 2018 were unfair, wildly untrue and demand a response.

For the record, Federated Farmers was never against a NAIT concept. However, it was then – and still should be – Feds’ job to interrogate the integrity of any concept pushed by the regulator, let alone those promoted by the levy bodies involved and technology salesmen.

Many claims were made about the benefits of a new tracing system. Primary amongst these claims was that New Zealand needed a nationwide electronic animal identification system to retain or obtain access to the international marketplace.  

That seemed plausible. So, about 2008, seeking confirmation that was fact, I wrote to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFaT) and asked where in the world this was such a requirement? “Nowhere”, came their written formal official response.  Is it still so today? Well I don’t know, but no doubt someone will say it isn’t. 

Secondly, the question was asked: why weren’t all cloven-hoof animals in the scheme if biosecurity rigour was the requirement? To omit any was illogical to Feds at the time. My guess is that it won’t be for much longer, while the regulator has producers over a barrel about NAIT frailties becoming so obvious.

Thirdly, we debated the technology being touted. We wanted it right, fit for purpose, with better retention than observed in flock and herds using tags to that point. We sought advice and – from memory – I recall something about high frequency systems being better than the chosen low frequency type and that micro-chipping retention was better than tags for long term animal ID.

All our input was dismissed by the regulator who, after being lobbied hard by major tag and technology providers, chose low frequency ear tags.   Of course, none of this made transport companies or stock agents jump at a potential new revenue stream that regulations normally give rise to. All they saw was cost and effort and a system that would fail.

Lastly, and perhaps only obvious to those close, the Feds’ meat and fibre chairs of the time caved in to the noise around them rather than standing strong. Their job was – and still is – to maintain authority over the property of members. They failed.  

What’s the upshot? We have a failing system because real farmers – who would have to apply effort and comply – were not listened to. It’s that simple.

If anyone had bothered to listen to the real and responsible questions at the outset, the mess surrounding the tracing of animals after the onset of Mycoplasma Bovis might have been avoided. 

From the beginning Feds wanted better. But as so often happens it was beaten down by political favour and self-interest. I hope the current NAIT review covers these massive gaps. The saying ‘you reap what you sow’ now seems apt. 

• Don Nicolson was a Federated Farmers NZ board member from 2003-11 and national president from 2008-2011.

More like this

Federated Farmers Welcomes RMA Replacement Passing

Federated Farmers says new legislation replacing the Resource Management Act will cut red tape, unlock investment and help grow New Zealand's export-led economy, after the Planning Bill and Natural Environment Bill passed their third reading in Parliament yesterday.

Arable ROI Crisis: Why Canterbury Farmers Are Moving On

Mid Canterbury Federated Farmers arable chair, Bevan Lill, said Beef + Lamb NZ data indicated that for the last six years, the average arable return on investment was about 0.8% while inflation ran about 4% - so the average arable farm was going backwards at about 3% a year.

Featured

Southland Farmers Face Wet Weather Toll, Support Available

Farmers across parts of Southland and South Otago are continuing to deal with difficult conditions after a prolonged run of wet weather, with pressure building around feed supply, stock management, pasture damage, farm infrastructure and everyday workloads.

How Wearable Tech Powers This 1,850-Cow Dairy Farm

For Canterbury dairy farmers Sian Meijer and Rick Wobben, wearable technology has become one of their most valuable on-farm tools - helping manage 1850 cows across an expansive, high-performing dairy operation while improving efficiency, mating outcomes and day-to-day decision making.

New Dairy Welfare Code Released, Takes Effect 2027

The first major update to the Dairy Cattle Code of Welfare in more than a decade has been released, marking what DairyNZ describes as an important step in ensuring animal welfare standards continue to evolve alongside scientific evidence and on-farm realities.

National

Machinery & Products