fbpx
Print this page
Wednesday, 16 November 2022 10:55

Editorial: Winter grazing farce

Written by  Staff Reporters
The cost of a resource consent in Southland would be $1,725 just for the deposit. The cost of a resource consent in Southland would be $1,725 just for the deposit.

OPINION: New winter grazing rules are now in force.

But there's a problem: farmers now have to fork out thousands of dollars to obtain resource consents from regional councils.

This is because the Government has failed to deliver freshwater farm plan templates that farmers could use to show that grazing won't worsen water conditions on their properties.

Farmers are rightly upset. The Government's promised three pathways for winter grazing for the last few years and its sheer incompetence that they're not ready yet.

The first pathway allows for grazing if it complies with national environmnetal standards for freshwater.

The second pathway, which is currently unavailable, requires a "freshwater farm plan" to be submitted to show grazing won't worsen water conditions.

The third will see farmers pay for resource consent through their regional council. In some cases, it could cost at least $1,000.

For example, the cost of a resource consent in Southland would be $1,725 just for the deposit.

Some disgruntled farmers at a recent Federated Farmers meeting said they would refuse to obtain a consent until the legislation is fully ready.

For its part, Federated Farmers has made it clear that farmers should carry out winter grazing in a responsible manner and in no way encourages farmers to break the law.

But when pathways are limited and full of roadblocks, people simply become frustrated.

Farmers' pleas for the regulations to be delayed until the farm plan pathway was available to farmers, to avoid the enormous consent burden on councils and farmers, fell on deaf ears.

At a recent Invercargill public meeting organised by Southland Federated Farmers, some elected representatives took a personal stance that they would not be applying for winter grazing consents as they consider them to be a waste of time and money.

Farmers say this is a clear indication of utter desperation, and only necessar because the Government has failed to deliver the promised alternative farm plan pathway.

The Government estimates 10,000 farmers will need to get a resource consent to undertake winter grazing. At an average cost of $2,000 each, the resource consents would leave farmers $20 million poorer.

In addition to the financial burden, the process of obtaining a resource consent is time consuming and stressful.

The need for the resource consent is largely down to Government, not farmer failures.

More like this

Editorial: Sensible move

OPINION: The Government's decision to rule out changes to Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) that would cost every farmer thousands of dollars annually, is sensible.

Dairy unity

OPINION: A last-minute compromise ensured that the election of the new Federated Farmers national dairy chair wasn't a repeat of the Super 15 rugby final - Canterbury versus Waikato.

Featured

Big return on a small investment

Managing director of Woolover Ltd, David Brown, has put a lot of effort into verifying what seems intuitive, that keeping newborn stock's core temperature stable pays dividends by helping them realise their full genetic potential.

Editorial: Sensible move

OPINION: The Government's decision to rule out changes to Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) that would cost every farmer thousands of dollars annually, is sensible.

National

Machinery & Products