Thursday, 29 January 2015 00:00

Kiwi farmers happy to manage on their own

Written by 
Most farms in New Zealand are family owned and operated. Most farms in New Zealand are family owned and operated.

Farmers are happy to run their businesses without formal governance boards and committees, according to a recent Lincoln University survey.

 The survey was conducted by Lincoln researchers Dr Kevin Old and Dr Peter Nuthall, and covered all farm types, sizes and regions. It was designed to look into the current situation for succession and governance on New Zealand farms. 

Old says most farms in New Zealand are family owned and operated. Only 1.24% have public company ownership. 

The survey found, on average, farms with a board or advisory committee earned a profit of $47,400 per person working on the farm. In contrast, all other farms made a profit of $49,900 per person. 

“While the difference is not great ($2400), there certainly isn’t a resounding return from having a board or committee. And, of course, these are averages. Some farms will gain from a board or committee, others not,’’ Old says. 

They found 69% of the farmers made all the decisions even if consulting family, friends and colleagues first. 

“They appeared to be disinterested in making use of alternative governance systems that might offer assistance and act as a break on hasty decisions and actions.’’

However, 45% did take advice from professional consultants.

Old and Nuthall say consultants, and others, have introduced the idea of having a formal board of directors, particularly for larger farms. Another possibility is having an advisory committee that operates less formally than a board. 

However, few farmers have taken up these ideas other than the public company owned farms. 

The survey revealed 4% of farms have a formal board. Another 5.3% have an advisory committee of various forms. These tend to be the larger farms, and multiple farm situations. 

Of farms worth over $25 million, 37% have a formal board. At the other extreme, of farms worth $5 million or less, only 1.74% have a formal board. 

The direct governance costs involved are not known but it is probable some boards contain family members such as a spouse who probably doesn’t receive any remuneration, Old says. 

Currently 55% of the farmers report they are ‘totally happy’ with their governance situation, and another 27% ‘reasonably happy’.  

“This leaves 18% somewhat discontent.’’ 

Some of the discontentment will be due to farmers’ understanding of the governance options — 34% believed they were fully aware of the options but 20% said they felt quite ignorant of the possibilities. The rest fell between these extremes. 

“Changing governance systems usually requires professional help,’’ Old says. 

The survey data showed 9.5% of farmers use professional farm advisors for succession and governance help for more than 10 hours per year.

But help comes from other quarters too. About 40% of farmers consult their ‘trusted persons’ for more than 10 hours per year. This might be a family member, respected colleague, or even a public consulting officer. 

Professional help costs, however. Old and Nuthall say farmers employing consultants pay, on average, $2790 per year for help with all problems, not just governance questions. 

Seventy-six percent of farmers spent absolutely nothing on advice.

Expenditure on consultants varied with farm size. Farmers with a net investment of less than $5 million spent $1330 per year. Farms worth more than $25 million spent $17,730 per year. 

“One hopes the benefits covered the costs,’’ Old says.

The survey also found how trustworthy outside help was perceived to be could also be an issue.

On a five point scale, only 56% of farmers expressed strong trust in their advisors rating them a one or two. 

“Perhaps if the 56% was higher more farmers would use more professional help to review their governance and ownership set ups,’’ he says. 

More like this

MOU a significant milestone

The signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Lincoln University and Ballance Agri-Nutrients is being hailed as a significant milestone.

Rural resilience programme expands

Mental health and resilience programme WellMates is available at Massey University for a second year after research found that it has significantly benefitted participants.

Study puts value on food safety research centre

A new study from Lincoln University’s Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit (AERU) has put a valuation on the NZ Food Safety Science & Research Centre in terms of its value to New Zealand.

Featured

Sheep drench resistance costly

Analysis by Dunedin-based Techion New Zealand shows the cost of undetected drench resistance in sheep has exploded to an estimated $98 million a year.

Dairy sheep and goat turmoil

Dairy sheep and goat farmers are being told to reduce milk supply as processors face a slump in global demand for their products.

Hurry up and slow down!

OPINION: We have good friends from way back who had lived in one of our major cities for many years.

National

Govt urged to reduce ETS units

The Climate Change Commission wants the new Government to reduce NZ Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) auction volumes as son as…

Dairy sheep, goat woes mount

Dairy sheep and goat farmers are being told to reduce milk supply as processors face a slump in global demand…

Machinery & Products

All-terrain fert spreading mode

Effluent specialists the Samson Group have developed a new double unloading system to help optimise uphill and downhill organic fertiliser…

Can-Am showcases range

Based on industry data collected by the Motor Industry Association, Can-Am is the number one side-by-side manufacturer in New Zealand.

» Latest Print Issues Online

Milking It

Papal visit

OPINION: European farmers are going to extreme lengths to have their message heard.

Thai egg tarts

OPINION: The hustle and bustle of one of Bangkok's most popular fast food outlets may feel a world away from…

» Connect with Dairy News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter