Wednesday, 06 May 2015 16:39

Costly fight too much for HortNZ

Written by 
HortNZ’s Chris Keenan: “We are deeply concerned about this decision across the country.” HortNZ’s Chris Keenan: “We are deeply concerned about this decision across the country.”

An "unworkable and economically” damaging recent Environment Court decision will not be challenged by Horticulture New Zealand because of the cost and time involved.

The court’s decision to uphold an appeal by Ngati Kahungunu in Hawke’s Bay was based on the interpretation of the words “maintenance and enhancement” of freshwater bodies.  The court says those words mean the water quality within every single water body must be managed in a way that water quality is maintained or enhanced.  

HortNZ believes this interpretation will cause huge problems because it goes against the direction the Government has taken in its national policy for freshwater, which allows local communities to decide how their water bodies are maintained. 

HortNZ says the decision could be used to challenge the development of land across the country for any purpose.  

“This is simply unworkable.  Land use is always changing, to meet the needs of communities. This can’t always happen with nil effect,” HortNZ natural resources manager Chris Keenan says.

HortNZ says appeal costs could be $100,000 plus, and with the considerable and increasing grower commitments to farm planning, environmental research and water quality tools it cannot justify the expense. 

“We are deeply concerned about the effect of this decision across the country, but growers can’t afford to fight it alone, and the issue is not ours alone.”

Activities such as urbanisation, farming, development of roads and other infrastructure can all have adverse effects on freshwater. 

“Central government will need to take a long, hard look at this decision and the words used in it.  Because the way it reads now, activities like regional development, greenfields subdivision and infrastructure development can all be challenged if they have impacts on water quality,” Keenan says.

More like this

EPA Chair Outlines Reforms to Speed Up Approvals

The chair of the country's environmental regulator, the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), says changes are already under way to improve the performance of the agency to better meet the needs of those who interface with them.

Featured

Arable ROI Crisis: Why Canterbury Farmers Are Moving On

Mid Canterbury Federated Farmers arable chair, Bevan Lill, said Beef + Lamb NZ data indicated that for the last six years, the average arable return on investment was about 0.8% while inflation ran about 4% - so the average arable farm was going backwards at about 3% a year.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

'LinkedIn Greens'

OPINION: The same mainstream media muppets that brought you Jacindamania in 2017 have been flat out pimping for the Opportunities…

UK Warning

OPINION: Your old mate reckons the atrocious way farmers in the UK are treated by their lords and masters in…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter