Wednesday, 03 October 2012 14:19

NZ ‘mishears’ world on food

Written by 

New Zealand's policy makers' misunderstanding of 'food safety,' may be adding thousands of dollars to the individual cost of agricultural production at the farm gate.

The World Bank in New York made this major admission to Massey University's Executive MBA students, says one of those students Letitia Isa.

"I was stunned to learn what we know as 'food security' is defined by the World Bank as 'food safety'. It may sound like semantics but it carries a huge implication for our agricultural producers and exporters," says Isa.

"This simple but fundamental misapprehension may see New Zealand jumping ever higher but illusionary hurdles. Instead of higher standards boosting returns, they may in fact be eroding them for almost no financial gain.

"When the World Bank says food safety they are not talking stainless steel, the National Animal Identification and Tracing Scheme or the Emissions Trading Scheme. What the World Bank means is how New Zealand can contribute to the feeding nine billion people by 2050.

"That carries with it a powerful but different policy message.

According to the University of Waikato's Professor of Agribusiness, Jacqueline Rowarth, New Zealand can feed some 24 million people. The United Nation's Food and Agriculture Organisation says developed countries need to increase output by 70% to do their bit.

"It might sound provocative, but we need to seriously weigh the cost-benefits of adopting polices that do not generate tangible revenue at the farm gate, or increase production," says Isa.

"While European supermarkets seem to be a de facto political and policy benchmark, are ever higher compliance costs worth it?

"It may sound counter intuitive, but perhaps quantity does have a quality all of its own. A simple metric maybe if a policy adds a dollar of cost, does it produce well over a dollar of added revenue at the farm gate?

"Moreover, are our other policy settings, particularly around Genetically Modified Organisms, retarding New Zealand's ability to do its fair global share?

"Certainly, the way the World Bank defines food safety needs to become central to New Zealand policy formation. If not, we risk unprecedented global disorder that New Zealand could not escape," Isa concluded.

More like this

Wrongheaded

OPINION: Food security is a sore point in the UK, as a direct result of its National Food Strategy, and there’s a lesson in this for other food producing nations like NZ: government meddling in farming is a very bad idea!

Seedy milk

OPINION: Seeds of legume plants are being used to make dairy-free milk products by scientists at Massey University’s Palmerston North labs.

The power of the puggo stick

A Massey University lecturer has devised a simple No. 8 wire device to help shed some light on how to improve the persistence of plantain in dairy farm pastures.

Featured

Feds make case for rural bank lending probe

Bankers have been making record profits in the last few years, but those aren’t the only records they’ve been breaking, says Federated Farmers vice president Richard McIntyre.

National

Fonterra unveils divestment plan

Fonterra is exploring full or partial divestment options for its global Consumer business, as well as its integrated businesses Fonterra…

Fonterra appoints new CFO

Fonterra has appointed a new chief financial officer, seven months after its last CFO’s shock resignation.

Machinery & Products

GPS in control

In a move that will make harvesting operations easier, particularly in odd-shaped paddocks, Kuhn has announced that GPS section control…

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Wrong, again!

OPINION: This old mutt well remembers the wailing, whining and gnashing of teeth by former West Coast MP and Labour…

Reality check

OPINION: Your canine crusader gets a little fed up with the some in media, union hacks, opposition politicians and hard-core…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter