Tuesday, 22 October 2019 07:55

Watchdog or lapdog?

Written by  Sudesh Kissun
Not happy: Waikato-based Fonterra farmers Trevor Simpson, Jim Cotman, and Mark Peters are asking shareholders to back two resolutions at next month’s annual meeting calling for an independent review of the Shareholders Council. Not happy: Waikato-based Fonterra farmers Trevor Simpson, Jim Cotman, and Mark Peters are asking shareholders to back two resolutions at next month’s annual meeting calling for an independent review of the Shareholders Council.

More Fonterra farmers are joining the call for an independent review of the co-op’s shareholders council.

But two farmer resolutions on the council’s future role as a shareholder watchdog are opposed by Fonterra’s board and the council. The board is asking farmers to vote against both proposals.

The two resolutions, to be voted at the co-op’s annual meeting in Invercargill next month, were filed separately: one by Lumsden farmer Tony Paterson and another by Waikato farmers led by Trevor Simpson, Jim Cotman, Mark Peters and Malcolm Lumsden.

Paterson’s resolution calls for an independent review of the council immediately after the AGM on November 7.

The Waikato farmers want a change in the way the council monitors the co-op’s performance. They want a performance committee of councillors and independent experts who would report twice yearly to all shareholders.

Fonterra’s board and the council are opposing both resolutions, on the grounds that the council has already announced an internal review.

But the Fonterra farmers point out that the council only announced its review after the two resolutions were filed before the deadline for AGM remits.

Simpson says his group supports Paterson’s resolution calling for an independent review: he isn’t surprised by the board’s and council’s stance on their resolution.

“Our position is that we don’t want just any review – we want an independent review. At the end of the day the council’s internal review falls short of what shareholders want,” he told Rural News.

“The difference is that the council wants to hold another internal review and shareholders want an independent review.”

Paterson said farmer response to his remit has been “very positive”.

He’s happy for farmers to support both resolutions.

“I don’t know why the board and council fear an independent review. Let the shareholders decide what they want.”

Simpson says their resolution was drawn up after consultation with farmers in Waikato. The group also met Fonterra chairman John Monaghan two months ago to give him a heads-up on their resolution.

He says some farmer shareholders believe the council has failed to perform its duty as a “watchdog” for shareholders.

“No business can audit itself. Shareholders no longer want Fonterra directors, staff or their own shareholders telling them about Fonterra’s performance. 

“Such information, with the best will, is received with a degree of scepticism. The time has arrived for us to mature sufficiently to want to hear the view on Fonterra’s performance from outside our ranks: in other words, some good ongoing independent analysis and informed views on the performance.”

Simpson is urging farmers to support both resolutions and send a clear signal to the board and council that farmers want things to change in the performance monitoring of their co-op.

More like this

Fonterra vote

OPINION: Voting is underway for Fonterra’s divestment proposal, with shareholders deciding whether or not sell its consumer brands business.

Winston Peters questions Fonterra divestment plan

Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has joined the debate around the proposed sale of Fonterra’s consumer and related businesses, demanding answers from the co-operative around its milk supply deal with the buyer, Lactalis.

Featured

Editorial: Credit where it's due

OPINION: While farmers are busy and diligently doing their best to deal with unwanted gasses, the opponents of farming - namely the Greens and their mates - are busy polluting the atmosphere with tirades of hot air about what farmers supposedly aren't doing.

Farmers Lead Sustainability Push: Woodchip bioreactor cuts nitrate runoff in Manawatu

Claims that farmers are polluters of waterways and aquifers and 'don't care' still ring out from environmental groups and individuals. The phrase 'dirty dairying' continues to surface from time to time. But as reporter Peter Burke points out, quite the opposite is the case. He says, quietly and behind the scenes, farmers are embracing new ideas and technologies to make their farms sustainable, resilient, environmentally friendly and profitable.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Red faced

OPINION: The Greens have taken the high moral ground on the Palestine issue and been leading political agitators in related…

Cold comfort

One of the most galling aspects of the tariffs whacked on our farm exports to the US is the fact…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter