The dumping of capital gains tax initiatives is yet another issue going right for the farming community – and farmers should cheer up, says Federated Farmers economics spokesperson and national vice-president Andrew Hoggard.
A new Federated Farmers survey shows less than 4% farmers believe they get good value for money from their rates.
"It’s local government election year and those chasing our votes can expect some very pointy questions on why average council rates in New Zealand jumped 79.7% between June 2007 and June 2017 when inflation (CPI) for the same period was only 23.1%," Federated Farmers president Katie Milne says.
On Tuesday this week, Federated Farmers launched a survey of its members to get a handle on farm rates to help inform our advocacy to the Productivity Commission’s Inquiry into Local Government Funding and Financing.
"By Friday morning, we’d already had 647 responses, with 440 of them landing on the first day. I think that speaks volumes about the level of concern about council costs," Milne says.
"As an ironical nod to the fact many farmers’ rates bills top $10,000, we said the first 200 respondents to our survey would get a ‘Federated Farmers $10K Rates Mug’. These were exhausted barely three hours after the survey opened.
"The sad fact is, based on the rising costs, we’re probably going to have to change to $20K Rates Mugs."
Of the 647 responses received so far:
544 provided Feds with an amount of rates they pay, with an average of $26,949 and median of $21,388. 46 pay less than $10,000. 199 pay between $10,000 and $20,000. 247 pay between $20,000 and $50,000 43 pay between $50,000 and $100,000 9 pay more than $100,000, with the highest amount $176,533 Only 3.7% of respondents agree that they get good value for money from their rates, with 96.3% disagreeing 87% of respondents consider roading to be the council activity mattering most to them.
This was followed by planning and regulation (41.7%), land drainage (23.6%), water and wastewater (23.4%) and governance (23%).
"Federated Farmers recognises the cost pressures on Councils and we’ve said before we’re delighted that the Productivity Commission is now investigating how local authorities might fund infrastructure in the future, as well as looking into regulatory creep and cost-shifting by central government," Milne says.
"Bills calculated on the current antiquated system of capital or land value-based rates often have little or no relationship with what a family, a business or a farm actually uses by way of council services.
"And here’s another message in this election year - we need people who have a sound understanding of rural and agricultural issues to stand, and get that perspective heard in Council chambers."