Friday, 25 October 2019 07:55

40 years and 800 studies prove safety

Written by  Mark Ross, chief executive of Agcarm
Mark Ross. Mark Ross.

Agcarm chief executive Mark Ross explains why we shouldn't fear glyphosate.

Glyphosate is used in New Zealand by farmers, councils and home gardeners.

It has recorded more than 40 years of safe use and has been the subject of over 800 studies, all of which have confirmed its safety.  

The herbicide offers effective and safe weed control, is low-volatility and degrades quickly in soil. It continues to be rigorously tested by regulators in NZ and worldwide, with over 160 countries approving its safe use.

At the heart of the hype that questions the safety of the herbicide is a misleading classification by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) made in 2015. IARC classifies substances using terms such as ‘possibly’ or ‘probably’ carcinogenic to define the potential hazard of a substance. This has led to several everyday products – including coffee, bacon and talcum powder, being categorised as ‘possibly carcinogenic’.  But the IARC report is not a risk assessment; it is the type and extent of human exposure that determines the actual risk.

IARC’s classification is misleading and has caused a great deal of unnecessary concern amongst the public.

Among the four World Health Organization (WHO) agencies which have evaluated the safety of glyphosate, the IARC is the only one to find an association between glyphosate and carcinogenicity. The WHO’s experts from the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) released assessments concluding that glyphosate is ‘unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans from exposure through the diet’. The WHO’s International Programme on Chemical Safety and Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR) found that glyphosate is not carcinogenic.

Assessments by the European Food Safety Authority, an independent agency funded by the European Union, also concluded that glyphosate is ‘unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans’.

More than four years after reaching its opinion, IARC is an outlier, as leading pesticide regulators worldwide continue to conclude that glyphosate is not carcinogenic and that glyphosate-based herbicides are safe when used as directed.

The discrepancy is because the IARC only identifies potential cancer hazards and bases its classification on a small selection of available data on the herbicides. The joint FAO and WHO assessment uses a much wider data set to assess the health risk to consumers from dietary exposure to pesticide residues in food.

The World Health Organisation said that the ‘IARC reviews published studies to identify potential cancer hazards. It does not estimate the level of risk to the population associated with exposure to the hazard’.

That’s a very important distinction. The IARC report is not a risk assessment. Actual risk is determined by the type and extent of human exposure.

In August of 2016, NZ’s Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) commissioned a review of the evidence relating to glyphosate and carcinogenicity and concluded that glyphosate is unlikely to be genotoxic or carcinogenic. The regulator deems it safe when used according to label instructions. 

Following from this, in 2018 the EPA stated that ‘there is no change to the science behind our current position, which is that products containing glyphosate remain safe to use when you follow the instructions on the product label’. 

As with any chemical product, users of herbicides should consult the product label before use. The label contains safety precautions and guidance.

The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) tests residues from commonly used agrichemicals. The food safety regulator confirms that the NZ diet is safe and that contaminants are very low - far below levels that would be a food safety risk – and mostly occur naturally. 

Conclusions about a matter as important as our health must be non biased, thorough and based on quality evidence based science that adheres to internationally recognised standards.

• Mark Ross is chief executive of Agcarm the industry association of companies which manufacture, distribute and sell animal health and crop protection products

More like this

Public round up on glyphosate

The country's environmental regulator agency has released the public feedback it has received on the glyphosate weed killer - commonly known as Roundup.

Rounding up on Round-Up

There's growing talk around New Zealand and the world about glyphosate being a health hazard, possibly a carcinogenic.

Lessons from Euro glyphosate review

Glyphosate use in Europe has resulted in reassessments, reviews and bans in some countries, causing a backlash by farmers. The controversial herbicide is touted by NZ Professor of Toxicology Ian Shaw as a victim of its own success.

National

FMD scare puts NZ on watch

A recent outbreak of Foot and Mouth disease (FMD) in Indonesia has the NZ agriculture sector and its officials on…

Public round up on glyphosate

The country's environmental regulator agency has released the public feedback it has received on the glyphosate weed killer - commonly…

New bee Guy!

Former Agriculture Minister Nathan Guy will take over as the independent chair of Apiculture New Zealand (ApiNZ).

Machinery & Products

A new approach to apprenticeships

By taking a new approach to its apprenticeship programme, agricultural equipment supplier Norwood says it is ensuring farmers’ machinery will…

Buck-Rake does the job

With many self-propelled forage harvester manufacturers offering machines hitting 1000hp, the bottleneck in any harvesting system is always likely to…

» The RNG Weather Report

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Yeah, right!

OPINION: Your old mate reckons recent ‘research’ carried out by consultants PWC – claiming that ‘actively managed carbon forestry’ creates…

All Claas!

OPINION: Your canine crusader - like many in the sector probably would have - raised an eyebrow when he heard…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter