Corporate narrative?
OPINION: Forget about the fabled 'rural-urban' divide, the real fault-line in farming might actually be the divide between grass-roots farmers and the industry corporates who claim to be 'speaking on behalf of farmers'.
No-one likes more rules and regulation, but to protect all parties in the sale of livestock we believe it is the best way forward.
Discussions about this topic have run hot and cold for years, but we believe it is time for some finality.
The NZ Stock and Station Agents Association has created a code of conduct and set up an independent body that can adjudicate on complaints about the actions of stock agents.
However, with all respect to the association, membership and thus adherence to the code is voluntary and we understand it currently only covers about 65% of all stock transactions.
Less reputable agents – a minority in the industry – are unlikely to become voluntary members and even if they do, when trouble arises they can simply resign and continue to trade.
A fully enforceable and regulated industry would be able to stop agents trading, and could impose redress.
As well as potential losses from fraudulent transactions, Federated Farmers members have also raised concerns about biosecurity risks where there is misrepresentation – either accidental or deliberate – and limited ability to seek redress in a voluntary system.
Another potential regulation that deserves debate is one that would require any stock agent who trades livestock on their own behalf to do so through an auction system or another agent, and not conduct the transaction on their own behalf.
A lot of ill-feeling is caused when a stock agent buys from a farmer when it’s not clear he is acting on his own behalf, keeps the animals on his property for a day or two, then on-sells at a substantial profit.
Feds’ meat and wool council does not envisage an increased cost to the farmer from regulation because, for most companies and agents, there would not be a huge change from how they are now operating with their own internal processes.
We are hoping for a positive response from the Government to support this.
Some will try to tie our advocacy for regulation to complaints made in relation to a former employee of a stock trading company in the South Island. However, irrespective of the current SFO investigation into that, it is well past time some sensible regulations were brought in to cover stock agencies.
The vast bulk of stock and station agents operate in an exemplary manner.
We need regulation to be fair, to give them protection also – not just the farmers.
• Miles Anderson is Federated Farmers’ meat and wool chair
