Thursday, 16 August 2018 07:55

Dwindling EU pest controls

Written by  Mark Ross, chief executive of Agcarm
Mark Ross. Mark Ross.

Growing regulatory and political pressure for more sustainable agriculture in Europe is causing concern for local farmers. 

Restrictive regulatory processes and political decisionmaking based on gaining votes, rather than good science, means very few new active substances are introduced. A gradual loss of these substances will see farmers struggling to control pest populations in coming years.

Trade barriers, threats to intellectual property, hazard-based assessments and political change are all causing regulatory uncertainty. With these drivers, an uncertain future prevails. 

Recently adopted European Union standards on endocrine disruptors resulted in complaints to the World Trade Organisation from Canada, Australia and the US. The criteria are deficient due to being based on hazards, without considering exposure – ignoring the principal of sound risk assessment. As a result, more substances could be banned, leading to restrictions in trade. Some of New Zealand’s fresh produce exported to Europe could come under greater scrutiny, due to a reduction in maximum residue levels (MRLs).

It is critical that decision-making on MRLs and import tolerances are based on complete risk assessments. Currently, if a compound is identified as an endocrine disruptor or meets other hazard-based cut-offs, such as for reproductive toxicants, the classification decisions trigger regulatory non-approval and default MRLs, regardless of the actual risks. 

Farmers support strict pesticide regulation and are well aware of the need to adopt measures to discourage the growth of pest populations. This keeps pesticides and other interventions to economically justified levels and minimises risks to people and the environment. But taking valuable tools away from farmers without sound risk-based science is ludicrous. Withdrawing products is sensible when it’s due to outdated chemistry, but not when it is brought about by political pressure, media ‘untruths’ or misinterpreted assessments.

Regulation needs to focus on science and safety, not political popularity. Europe’s conservative approach to approving new agrichemicals is longstanding, but the current regulatory environment is out of control.

A major concern is NZ regulators adopting EU practices for assessing products. Agcarm and its member companies are watching this. 

We remain focused on stewardship and ensuring that regulatory processes and decisions are sensible. Sensible regulatory systems allow the use of agrichemicals that are proven to be safe, environmentally friendly, effective and targeted. 

This allows a variety of new products that offer pest control solutions for farmers now and in future. 

• Mark Ross is chief executive of Agcarm.


More like this

Making pesticides safe

OPINION: A culture of trepidation about consuming foods which have been exposed to pesticides is misleading and has sparked much confusion of late.

Benefits of glyphosate

Glyphosate, the world’s most widely used weed killer, has extensive economic and environmental benefits for farmers, especially New Zealand’s grains industry. 

Minister stings sector

The ‘wild west’ of the primary sector is what the Minister of Agriculture Damien O'Connor calls the bee industry. 

NZ risks being left behind

New Zealand's animal health industry is moving ahead quickly, but risks being left behind because it can’t embrace new scientific discoveries says Agcarm president Pauline Calvert.


» The RNG Weather Report

» Latest Print Issues Online

Milking It

Milk on tap

The days of cafes getting milk in plastic bottles may be numbered if two young Dunedin entrepreneurs have their way.

Behind the eight ball

Global animal health company DSM says it has a product that can help reduce emissions from cows by up to…

» Connect with Dairy News