Tuesday, 04 September 2012 16:38

Case made for company vs trust

Written by 

THOUGH MANY farms are in trusts, Palmerston North Crown prosecutor Ben Vanderkolk believes this creates problems in succession planning. 

He says essentially a trust is ‘just a bundle of rights and obligations’ which doesn’t ‘own anything’.  The obligation of the trustees is to look after the interests of the ‘beneficiaries’, in most cases siblings.

“A trust has no corporate structure so it doesn’t grow or prosper or manage anything. Trusts are very difficult to unscramble. The key problem is that the trustees are the owner of the whole asset – it is difficult to administer in a way that children can get funds out or have their entitlement distributed to them.  And it’s rare that children will challenge the trustees, who are usually the parents alongside the family solicitor and accountant.”

Vanderkolk says from what he’s seen, trusts have a place in protecting assets but are poor vehicles for farming operations and capital holding. And structurally they are difficult to operate.  A question worth asking, when considering setting up a trust, is, can you guarantee that you can control it after your death? 

“With a company you can have just enough capital needed to run the business, and the rest of the capital generated as dividends, profits and retained earnings is available for investment off the farm or to buy shareholders out. There are advantages in a company structure because equity is reflected by the value of the shares, directors are charged with increasing shareholder value and capital can be managed to successfully fund the operation.”

With a company structure, the children could be encouraged to participate in its governance as opposed to merely being employees on farm.  Parents or owners should find out what their children want to do and make sure the entity has sufficient capital for them to pursue off-farm careers if that’s what they want.

“Fundamentally a company director has to protect the value of the company shareholding whereas a trustee has a duty to protect and promote the benefit and maintenance of the beneficiaries, not necessarily grow the wealth of the business. Farmers should be able to concentrate on farming and governance of the farming enterprise rather than worry about the discharge of their fiduciary duty as trustees.”

• For a profile of Ben Vanderkolk turn to pages 10-11

More like this

Be aware of potential liabilities

It is important for potential trustees to weigh up the risks compared to the rewards when considering whether or not to accept a role on a trust, says Tony Marshall, tax advisory principal, Crowe Horwarth's Dunedin office.

Featured

Brendan Attrill scoops national award for sustainable farming

Brendan Attrill of Caiseal Trust in Taranaki has been announced as the 2025 National Ambassador for Sustainable Farming and Growing and recipient of the Gordon Stephenson Trophy at the National Sustainability Showcase at in Wellington this evening.

National

Machinery & Products

Calf feeding boost

Advantage Plastics says it is revolutionising calf meal storage and handling, making farm life easier, safer, and more efficient this…

JD's precision essentials

Farmers across New Zealand are renowned for their productivity and efficiency, always wanting to do more with less, while getting…

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Don't hold back!

OPINION: ACT MP Mark Cameron isn’t everyone’s cup of tea, but he certainly calls it how he sees it, holding…

Sorry, not sorry

OPINION: Did former PM Jacinda Ardern get fawning reviews for her book?

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter