Wednesday, 02 December 2015 14:04

Council directive angers farmers – Gent

Written by  Sudesh Kissun
Former Fonterra directors Greg Gent (left), Harry Bayliss (centre), and Earl Rattray discuss matters at the annual meeting. Former Fonterra directors Greg Gent (left), Harry Bayliss (centre), and Earl Rattray discuss matters at the annual meeting.

Fonterra farmers were angry with the directive from the Shareholders Council to vote against a remit, says Greg Gent.

He says the 53.8% 'yes' vote despite the council directive sends a strong message to councillors.

"As a representative body of shareholders they failed," Gent told Rural News.

"Farmers were angered by the council directing them how they should vote."

Council chairman Duncan Coull says it has a constitutional responsibility to review all shareholder proposals, make decisions on them, and "communicate our view of them and the reasons for these decisions to our shareholders".

"However, this process will never preclude our shareholders' right to vote in the manner which they deem appropriate," he says.

Coull says it will take the views of shareholders into on-going discussions with regard to the governance and representation review. "We're looking forward to this process and to a robust consultation process with our shareholders from which we will all have the opportunity to decide the best way forward for our co-op."

Gent says the vote is also a clear sign to Fonterra's board to act now on governance and review. "But I think it sent a stronger message to the Shareholders Council."

Gent and remit co-sponsor Colin Armer held seven farmer meetings around the country to promote their remit, calling for a nine-member board.

He says they did not have a full list of Fonterra suppliers and had to rely on advertisements and media articles.

"We advertised in the local paper; the press was quite generous to us. We also emailed some farmers with our views and were surprised at how viral it went."

Gent says during the farmer meetings the message was clear: farmers wanted a smaller board.

"Not one person said to us that a smaller board is not a good idea. That was clearly reflected in the vote."

Gent admitted the remit's downsizing suggestion was a weakness.

Fonterra chairman John Wilson acknowledged farmers want a smaller board. He told the annual meeting that was the message he got from taking part in farmer meetings around the country during the director election campaign.

Wilson was re-elected for another three-year term, along with Nicola Shadbolt.

However, Blue Read was ousted after serving three years on the board.

Te Awamutu farmer and former National Foods chief executive and Ashley Waugh is the new director.

More like this

Fonterra R&D: Innovation needs more than just PhDs

Common sense and good human judgement are still a key requirement for the super highly qualified staff working at one of New Zealand's largest and most important research facilities - Fonterra's R&D Centre at Palmerston North.

Misguided campaign

OPINION: Last week, Greenpeace lit up Fonterra's Auckland headquarters with 'messages from the common people' - that the sector is polluting the environment.

Featured

Big return on a small investment

Managing director of Woolover Ltd, David Brown, has put a lot of effort into verifying what seems intuitive, that keeping newborn stock's core temperature stable pays dividends by helping them realise their full genetic potential.

Editorial: Sensible move

OPINION: The Government's decision to rule out changes to Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) that would cost every farmer thousands of dollars annually, is sensible.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Overbearing?

OPINION: Dust ups between rural media and PR types aren't unheard of but also aren't common, given part of the…

Foot-in-mouth

OPINION: The Hound hears from his canine pals in Southland that an individual's derogatory remarks on social media have left…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter