Wednesday, 29 July 2020 10:15

What’s different? — Editorial

Written by  Staff Reporters
The latest wool report looks like yet another glossy document that will sit on the shelf. The latest wool report looks like yet another glossy document that will sit on the shelf.

OPINION: Long-time wool industry observers have greeted the latest report aimed at resurrecting the ailing fortunes of the country’s struggling strong wool sector with a healthy dose of cynicism.

The latest incarnation, Vision and Action for NZ’s Wool Sector, was produced by the Wool Industry Project Action Group (PAG), chaired by Wanaka-based agribusiness man John Rodwell. Even he concedes that farmers will take plenty of convincing that this latest report won’t join its long list of predecessors and be left to gather dust on the shelf. 

The PAG report sets out three key recommendations for revitalising the sector:

• Developing a market-focused investment case and strategic roadmap for the strong wool sector. 

• Establishing the capability necessary to get the sector match fit and ready for the opportunities ahead. 

• Establishing a governance and coordination capability.

Wool growers have heard these types of woolly ideas before. Is there any wonder they are cynical that this latest report will be any different to the myriad of others that have been produced in the past – including the infamous McKinsey Report from the dying days of the Wool Board?

Meanwhile, growers have seen strong wool prices slump 40% since the 1990s. Latest auction results for full fleece make grim reading. Good quality cross-bred, greasy wool is managing just $1.50/kilogram, which rises to $1.90/kg for “really good” clean wool – a price drop of between 35 - 40 % over the past quarter alone.

“We believe we are on the cusp of a natural fibre renaissance, led by more environmentally and socially conscious consumers, and that a new approach is needed,” the PAG report says.

Really?

Currently shearing for most strong wool growers is a cost and more of an animal welfare issue, given the low prices for wool, rather than a viable income stream.

As former Wool Board member Lochie MacGillivray told Rural News, if the strong wool sector’s fortunes can be resurrected, much of the knowledge and skill set to do this has already departed the industry and it would take an awful lot of effort to revive this. 

MacGillivray also points out that the technology for the manufacture of strong wool has also fallen behind that of synthetics. He claims machines manufacturing nylon can operate at greater speeds than those for wool, which makes their products more competitive.

Unfortunately, the latest wool report looks like yet another glossy document that will sit on the shelf.

More like this

Featured

RSE Scheme Changes Coming - McClay

Agriculture Minister Todd McClay has admitted that a scheme bringing workers from Pacific nations to work on orchards has become too hard to navigate but says changes are coming.

Andy Macfarlane Joins AgriZeroNZ Board

Canterbury farmer Andy Macfarlane has been appointed to the board of AgriZeroNZ, the public-private partnership designed to accelerate the development and deployment of emissions reduction tools for New Zealand farmers.

National

Machinery & Products

 

 

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

True Reflection?

A fair question has been raised about how member-funded organisations should conduct themselves when taking a public position on any…

Civil Circus!

OPINION: It really is getting harder to lampoon government bureaucrats when they do such a good job of it themselves.…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter