Narrowing agricultural pathways not a smart idea

In her announcement on the “future-focused” curriculum, she removed Agricultural and Horticultural Science as a standalone senior secondary subject.

Thankfully, we now hear that after a strong backlash the Minister has backtracked, pledging to keep Agricultural and Horticultural Science in schools in addition to a vocational pathway. But her poor process and the lack of meaningful consultation reveal the Minister’s intentions that she would push through her agenda regardless of concerns raised by educators and the agriculture sector.

Narrowing curriculum pathways to the agricultural industry is a mistake - for several key reasons.

First, New Zealand’s future agricultural workforce requires more than farmers. We need wrap-around people too, those working in science labs, agribusiness, policy, or technology. Without a standalone pathway in Agricultural and Horticultural Science, some students might look to pursue other fields, directly impacting our future workforce.

Second, many urban schools don’t currently offer the vocational agricultural pathways, and they can only get exposure through that curriculum pathway. This means some students would lose the opportunity to learn about an entire sector simply because of where they live or what their school offers.

And third, in the Central North Island, we’re hearing that demand for agricultural courses is higher than ever, sometimes even outpacing traditional sciences. This tells us something important about how students see agriculture’s relevance in their future.

Read More:

• Public backlash saves ag & hort in NZ schools
• Massey University to upskill teachers amid rising ag subject demand
• NZEI unhappy with funding cut for teachers

The future of agriculture extends far beyond the farm gate. It’s in laboratories, boardrooms, policy offices, and tech startups. It’s about building sustainable food systems, tackling big problems associated with climate change, and increasing our global exports. Students all over New Zealand, both rural and urban, should have access to these pathways, and education is the foundation that makes it possible.

What’s more, the decision to remove agriculture as a stand-alone curriculum subject came out of the blue. Educators and industry leaders were blindsided by the change. Some were even consulting on Level 1 curriculum options, but there was no indication that the subject might be removed entirely. And with only five days remaining for submissions on the proposed NCEA changes when the news broke, it only added insult to injury. It’s all disappointing, because education should always be about expanding opportunities, not closing doors.

This isn’t just about a school subject; it’s about respect for a vital sector and our next generation. The Ministers in this Government are detached from the realities on the ground and are making disconnected policy decisions in silos. 

If National truly believes in growing the future of farming, exports, and rural innovation, they need to start listening and engaging in meaningful consultation. Our students, teachers, and the entire sector deserve better than to be left on edge, forced to scramble in defense of their sudden decisions.

Jo Luxton is Labour Spokesperson for Agriculture, Biosecurity and Rural Communities.