Wednesday, 09 May 2018 07:55

Farmers can appeal M. bovis payout

Written by  Nigel Malthus
Peter Hansen, Jersey breeder. Peter Hansen, Jersey breeder.

Farmers affected by Mycoplasma bovis and unhappy with compensation payments offered may go to arbitration and appeal, says MPI.

“Claimants can write back to us pointing out why they believe our assessments are incorrect and can provide further evidence of their losses. At the same time they can still bank the compensation payment,” said an MPI spokesman.

“If claimants are still unhappy they have rights under section 162a of the Biosecurity Act to take us to arbitration.”

MPI was responding to questions about Fernside Jersey breeder Peter Hansen, denied compensation for MPI’s blocking his importation of four Jersey cows from Australia.

While Hansen believes he is the only affected farmer so far denied compensation, MPI said this is not so.

“Others [have] claims in dispute. Some claimants are questioning the compensation payment but we are unable to provide further information for privacy reasons.”

By late April MPI had received 95 claims for compensation assessed at $5.8 million, and had paid out $3.22m. None of the claims then received related to the 28 farms whose herds were to be culled. 

Meanwhile, the latest update lists 32 infected farms, and 53 properties under Restricted Place Notices.

MPI insists it cannot name affected farms because of the Privacy Act.

“This is the case for all farms under controls, whether it’s because they have a positive M.bovis infection status or because they are under suspicion and undergoing testing. 

“Sometimes a property is under restrictions when there’s considered to be even a low risk of disease. These affected farmers have a right to privacy and it is up to them whether or not they want to inform others of the situation.”

Properties under RPNs may not move animals on or off premises without permission from MPI. While properties under notice of direction (NoD) must apply for a permit to move animals off their premises, they are free to move animals on to their property.

MPI said several farms are being tested without having a risk that requires movement restrictions. They are not legally required to take any special measures and may operate as usual.

More like this

Top ag scientist to advise PM

A highly experienced agricultural scientist with specialist knowledge of the dairy sector is the Prime Minister's new Chief Science Advisor.

Controls lifted at poultry farm

Movement controls have been lifted from Mainland Poultry’s Hillgrove Farm in Otago, after the successful eradication of H7N6 strain of high pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI).

Farmers struggle with water and feed shortages

The drought in western parts of the North Island is reaching crisis point with many farmers from Northland to Taranaki having to truck in water and feed for their stock at great expense.

Featured

Rockit Global appoints COO

Rockit Global has appointed Ivan Angland as its new chief operating officer as it continues its growth strategy into 2025.

National

Machinery & Products

Gongs for best field days site

Among the regular exhibitors at last month’s South Island Agricultural Field Days, the one that arguably takes the most intensive…

» Latest Print Issues Online

Milking It

Science fiction

OPINION: Last week's announcement of Prime Minister’s new Science and Technology Advisory Council hasn’t gone down too well in the…

Bye bye Paris?

OPINION: At its recent annual general meeting, Federated Farmers’ Auckland province called for New Zealand to withdraw from the Paris…

» Connect with Dairy News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter