Wednesday, 25 November 2015 16:11

Time to deliver on governance review

Written by  Sudesh Kissun
Colin Armer (left) and Malcolm Bailey. Colin Armer (left) and Malcolm Bailey.

The proposal to reduce the size of the Fonterra board is one the co-op can no longer ignore say its proponents, Greg Gent and Colin Armer.

The proposal failed to meet the 75% support required to change the constitution but the level of support is a massive message to the board they say. Over 54% of shareholders backed the proposal.

"The Trading Among Farmers proposal got 66% support with millions spent so we are thrilled with the support we have received," says Armer.

"Something has to happen now. The whole thing disappeared three years ago but there is nowhere for the board to hide now."

Gent says the vote was a huge success.

"We had little resources and the company worked hard against us."

Armer said the big loser in this debate was the Shareholders Council.

"The shareholders council has been found wanting and totally misread farmers' views on the subject," he says. "Their criticism of our proposal was absurd.

"The resurrection of the governance review after three years was a last minute jack-up between the Council and the board which had only one purpose – to defeat our proposal," says Armer.

He says that the governance review is still inadequate.

"This upcoming review needs independence, experience, and farmer input into its Terms of Reference," he said. "Right now shareholders don't know the terms of reference and the review is being conducted by a group that lacks the experience or independence needed to make sure we get the right structures into the future."

Gent said that he and Armer had achieved what they wanted to.

"While we'd love to have got our proposal over the 75% line line we always knew that it was a huge mountain to climb," he said. "The company has far better resources than us to communicate with its 10,000 shareholders."

In spite of the result the pair is confident that the governance review will not be shelved for another three years. However they are not so sure that the review will result in a smaller board of directors.

"We will need to wait and see about that," says Armer.

More like this

Farmers' call

OPINION: Fonterra's $4.22 billion consumer business sale to Lactalis is ruffling a few feathers outside the dairy industry.

Wasted energy

OPINION: Finance Minister Nicola Willis could have saved her staff and MBIE time and effort over ‘buttergate’ recently by not playing politics with butter prices in the first place.

Featured

Dr Mike Joy says sorry, escapes censure

Academic Dr Mike Joy and his employer, Victoria University of Wellington have apologised for his comments suggesting that dairy industry CEOs should be hanged for contributing towards nitrate poisoning of waterways.

People-first philosophy pays off

The team meeting at the Culverden Hotel was relaxed and open, despite being in the middle of calving when stress levels are at peak levels, especially in bitterly cold and wet conditions like today.

Farmer anger over Joy's social media post

A comment by outspoken academic Dr Mike Joy suggesting that dairy industry leaders should be hanged for nitrate contamination of drinking/groundwater has enraged farmers.

National

Machinery & Products

JDLink Boost for NZ farms

Connectivity is widely recognised as one of the biggest challenges facing farmers, but it is now being overcome through the…

New generation Defender HD11

The all-new 2026 Can-Am Defender HD11 looks likely to raise the bar in the highly competitive side-by-side category.

» Latest Print Issues Online

Milking It

Buttery prize

OPINION: Westland Milk may have won the contract to supply butter to Costco NZ but Open Country Dairy is having…

Gene Bill rumours

OPINION: The Gene Technology Bill has divided the farming community with strong arguments on both the pros and cons of…

» Connect with Dairy News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter