Thursday, 22 July 2021 12:55

Don't take away farmers' rights

Written by  Peter Buckley
Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) are becoming a very important topic for farmers. Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) are becoming a very important topic for farmers.

Significant Natural Areas (SNA) are becoming a very important topic for farmers who are finding that parts of their properties have been or will be designated as SNA’s due to a perceived high level of indigenous biodiversity and will be captured under the proposed National Policy Statement (NPS) for Indigenous Biodiversity.

As the saying goes ‘the devil is in the detail!’ The proposed NPS does not just cover the designated SNA but also covers areas that are seen as connecting pathways between SNA’s.

This NPS for Indigenous Biodiversity doesn’t take into account private property rights. Currently, landowners have been working under permitted activity rules under the RMA, and have been voluntarily protecting many significant areas on the land. Yet now under this NPS they are to be constrained in what they can do.

Common justice would expect compensation for land taken by the Crown. Surely landowners should be compensated. But no, Minister Shaw (Climate Change Minister James Shaw) has stated that they would not be compensated because the policy would not stop them from using their land. Rubbish!

An example of government paying for taking away private property rights was the Waikato Regional Council’s Variation 5. This paid for the nitrogen to be taken out of the Lake Taupo Catchment. Using this example, if the crown wants to impose conditions on Indigenous Biodiversity on private land they should enter into meaningful consultation with landowners. If SNA’s are agreed to, then compensation must be applied. We see the three district councils and the regional council chair on the West Coast and two local rūnanga chairmen wrote to the Minister James Shaw opposing the SNA process and only received a “generic response letter” back.

Minister James Shaw said existing activities would be able to continue on SNA’s providing they happen in partnership with nature. Some new activities could be possible with a resource consent, the minister said. What on earth is he talking about?

Minister Shaw, the question needs to be asked, why are these proposed SNA’s to be imposed on private land? If you know how farmers think and behave, you would know that these areas were left because landowners recognised the value of retaining these special places, making that decision unfettered by needless legislation. It has long been part of landowners’ culture.

We note too that the Prime Minister made a clear statement that there would be no new taxes under her government this term. Yeah Right!

The short definition of a tax is: “A tax is a compulsory financial charge or some other type of levy imposed on a taxpayer by a governmental organisation”.

The designation of an SNA which takes away some private property rights surely falls within the definition of “some other type of levy imposed on a taxpayer by a governmental organisation”.

The Government seems to want to blame the rural sector for all the ill winds that blow through. There is no acknowledgement of all the good works that rural sectors have achieved. It seems highly likely that imposing SNA’s as part of the NPS will lead to more unproductive government bureaucracy.

Peter Buckley is a Waikato farmer and a former chairman of Waikato Regional Council.

More like this

SNAs will go - eventually

Despite some earlier confusion around the exact timing, the new Government is moving to reform the way local bodies implement Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) rules on farmland.

Red meat farmers welcome suspension of SNAs

Beef + Lamb New Zealand (B+LNZ) has welcomed the Government’s announcement it is suspending the requirement for councils to comply with the Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) provisions of the National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity for three years while it replaces the Resource Management Act (RMA). 

Dealing with SNAs

As Associate Minister for Agriculture and the Environment, Andrew Hoggard has a number of delegations to focus on.

Don't blame cows for emissions

OPINION: From burping cows to grazing sheep, when it comes to global warming, the finger of blame is invariably pointed at the livestock farming industry these days.

Featured

Sheep drench resistance costly

Analysis by Dunedin-based Techion New Zealand shows the cost of undetected drench resistance in sheep has exploded to an estimated $98 million a year.

Dairy sheep and goat turmoil

Dairy sheep and goat farmers are being told to reduce milk supply as processors face a slump in global demand for their products.

Hurry up and slow down!

OPINION: We have good friends from way back who had lived in one of our major cities for many years.

National

Govt urged to reduce ETS units

The Climate Change Commission wants the new Government to reduce NZ Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) auction volumes as son as…

Dairy sheep, goat woes mount

Dairy sheep and goat farmers are being told to reduce milk supply as processors face a slump in global demand…

Machinery & Products

All-terrain fert spreading mode

Effluent specialists the Samson Group have developed a new double unloading system to help optimise uphill and downhill organic fertiliser…

Can-Am showcases range

Based on industry data collected by the Motor Industry Association, Can-Am is the number one side-by-side manufacturer in New Zealand.

» Latest Print Issues Online

Milking It

Papal visit

OPINION: European farmers are going to extreme lengths to have their message heard.

Thai egg tarts

OPINION: The hustle and bustle of one of Bangkok's most popular fast food outlets may feel a world away from…

» Connect with Dairy News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter