Thursday, 31 March 2022 09:55

A Bugger's Muddle

Written by  Jock Alliso
Jock Allison claims the proposed ag emissions pricing schemes will leg-rope agriculture and have no effect other than reducing NZ’s standard of living. Jock Allison claims the proposed ag emissions pricing schemes will leg-rope agriculture and have no effect other than reducing NZ’s standard of living.

OPINION: Jacqueline Rowarth opined in Rural News, January 19, "Confusion abounds about agricultural greenhouse gases (GHGs) and misinformation is rife".

Correct, but unfortunately the explanations given re the inclusion of agriculture in the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), the 'split-gas approach' and the confusion about the appropriate metric for methane, GWP 100 or GWP, do little to stem the flow of confusion.

The basis of the global warming mantra is not based on fact. Similarly, the alarm about methane and nitrous oxide is also not based on fact. To be fair, there has been a huge agricultural press about methane and the ETS. However, the industry is totally confused, not that this will be acknowledged by industry leaders in Federated Farmers, Beef + Lamb, Fonterra and many others.

Rowarth notes that, "Agriculture is already in the ETS but has been given a 100% free allocation until 2025. After that, it will be included at 95%, decreasing 1% per year until 2030 - and by 2050 will be entirely included".

I am not sure what this actually means. But it is pretty clear the Climate Change Minister James Shaw is not enthralled by the suggestions made by the working group on agricultural emissions (HWEN), which have been reported as delivering less than 1% reductions in GHG emissions. The very suggestion of such a "lukewarm" response apparently has the Greens rank and file up in arms.

However, I believe that agricultural GHGs should not be taxed/levied at all.

Much has been written about the split-gas approach, which allows the short-lived gas methane to be treated differently from long-lived gases, CO2 and nitrous oxide. The problem is that CO2 is a short-lived gas also, although this is not accepted by the IPCC.

Much has been written in the farming press and the scientific literature about methane's effectiveness as a GHG. Professor David Frame from Victoria University has consulted widely with industry about a new metrc GWP* to replace GWP (the Global Warmin Potential) for methane, stated by the IPCC to be about 28 times as effective as a GHG than CO2.

Our work published in 2017 in the NZ Institute of Primary Industry Management Journal based on the work of two American Professors is still correct - although no one seems interested? See; the contribution of methane and nitrous oxide to warming is negligible. Water vapour (as noted by the IPCC) is the main GHG, and CO2 has a minor effect only.

The GWP* metrict, widely promoted to industry, although through questionable science, if adopted would assess the effect of methane probably as a quarter or one fifth of the present estimates.

However, the metric is unsuitable anyway, for on-farm estimates of methane effects. My efforts to get a simple figure, say 20 or 25%, from the proponents Myles Allen and Professor Frame have been ignored. NZ officials and Minister James Shaw have no intention of promoting the new metrict to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change anyway, so all of this discussion is moot.

Meanwhile Article 2b of the Paris Agreement states it aims to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change, "(b) Increasing the ability to adapt to the adverse impacts of climate change and foster climate resilience and low greenhouse gas emissions development, in a manner that does not threaten food production".

Our COP climate negotiators, our government and our industry leaders all seem totally deaf to this definition. Yes, our agriculture is producing food for the world, Government policies are reducing food production, whille the effect of methane on climate is negligible, and CO2 is a short-term gas.

Yes, it is time to do the math, but the assumptions for that math need to be credible. We seem to be in a complete 'Buggers Muddle' intent on leg-roping billions of dollars which will have no effect other than reducing out standard of living.

Dr Jock Allison, ONZM, FNZIPM, was previously director of the Invermay Research Centre.

More like this

Science behind ETS needs a reassessment

OPINION: Government, industry representatives and media always state: “our commentary, policy etc., is science based” and “the science is settled”.

Cow cull coming?

Farmers are happy to play their part in reducing greenhouse gas emissions but the Government has to come to the party.


Farmers back ACT MP's bill

ACT MP and Northland dairy farmer Mark Cameron is lodging a new member’s bill that would prevent regional and district councils from regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

Calls for more support for vets, nurses

The animal health sector needs to change to keep up with the times, according to the discussion at a breakfast event hosted by Boehringer Ingelheim at the NZ Vet Association and NZ Veterinary Nursing Association conference in Christchurch recently.


Govt unveils climate strategy

The Government has launched its new Climate Strategy, which it says is a comprehensive and ambitious plan to reduce the…

Machinery & Products

More efficient jumbo wagons

In a move that will be welcomed by many, Austrian manufacturer Pottinger appears to be following a trend of bringing…

Fieldays' top young innovator

Growing up on a South Waikato sheep and beef farm, Penny Ranger has firsthand experience on the day-to-day challenges.

Claas completes 500,000th machine

Claas is celebrating half a million combine harvesters built since 1936, marking the occasion by building anniversary machines from the…

Donated tractors welcome news

When Cyclone Gabrielle hit in February 2023, it left an estimated $13.5 billion worth of damage across New Zealand.

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Fieldays focused

OPINION: Your old mate had a wee crack at Fieldays recently for the perception it was more focused on quantity…

'Woke madness'

OPINION: Real estate agent Janet Dickson's court case, following her refusal to complete a compulsory Māori culture course, is being watched…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter