Friday, 15 September 2017 07:45

Water trading not a good idea

Written by  Chris Allen
Chris Allen. Chris Allen.

Fellow Feds board member Andrew Hoggard and I have just returned from a five-day study tour in Australia hosted by Mercury Energy.

The power company sent 36 of us there, representing Waikato River catchment interests such as power generators, iwi, Niwa, the Ministry of Environment, Fonterra and Waikato Regional Council.

The aim was to learn about the Murray Darling River water management plan and how water trading is working.

The Murray Darling river system occupies a vast basin the size of France and Spain. It traverses four states, all of which are deemed to own their water.

We heard about the origins and struggles of state governments competing for a share in the water resource, and about the complexities of operating a system so modified by man that it can take three months for water to travel its length, while trying to deliver water to customers for abstraction and environmental purposes.

The whole system is being modernised at a cost of about $13 billion, including onfarm grants from the federal government. Efficiency savings are enabling a return of about 30% of water back to the environment.

In New Zealand water for irrigation is attached to the land. It is not owned and no one pays for water; we only pay for infrastructure, delivery, etc, and require consents to be renewed every few years.

In Australia water is separated from the land and within certain rules can be freely traded (you can buy water to release down a river). No one pays for water in Australia either; there is a water charge for management and maintenance of the system.

Australia spent many billions and still had water shortages, so they wanted water trading, hence the need for disconnecting the land from the water.

I am yet to be convinced that water is flowing as intended in Australia, as much of it is moving to high value crops that don’t require the same size communities to support the farms.

Two key points we noted:

1. When the government paid for upgrading half the onfarm infrastructure, the farmers saw the benefits, couldn’t wait and paid to do the rest.

2. Policy that doesn’t have good solid science behind it will fail.

• Chris Allen is Federated Farmers’ water spokesman.

More like this

NZ Farm Accident Claims Drop Nearly 35% Since 2020

A huge reduction in ACC claims from on-farm accidents over the last five years is due to thousands of small, practical decisions being made in sheds, yards, paddocks and around kitchen tables across the country, says Safer Farms ambassador Lindy Nelson.

Featured

NZ Farm Accident Claims Drop Nearly 35% Since 2020

A huge reduction in ACC claims from on-farm accidents over the last five years is due to thousands of small, practical decisions being made in sheds, yards, paddocks and around kitchen tables across the country, says Safer Farms ambassador Lindy Nelson.

Inside the Moxhams' Award-Winning Organic Dairy Farm

Wayne and Ange Moxham of Horowhenua have just been named as Fonterra's top organic performer for milksolids. As well as providing organic milk to Fonterra, the couple also sell Udderly Organic milk to more than 100 outlets in the region and are embarking on another exciting venture producing organic gelato. Reporter Peter Burke went along to see their farming operation.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

Milking It

Political Points

OPINION: Staying on Plan Change 1, NZ First deputy leader Shane Jones took to social media to gain some political…

PC1 Dilemma

OPINION: All eyes are on the Government as Waikato farmers seek urgent help to fend off the controversial Plan Change…

» Connect with Dairy News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter